различия такие
* The morphing effect that Lightview uses is a refreshing change (probably because I have seen the Lightbox effects too many times!).
* Lightview allows you to customise many of the visual aspects of the viewer programatically. For example, the background colour and corner radius.
* Lightview supports a customisable slideshow option which Lightbox lacks.
* Lightview uses the caption attribute of the tag to give images a caption. This attribute is not valid XHTML and thus its usage will produce invalid markup. I would suggest using a convention similar to that used by MooTools Tips: title="image title :: caption"
* Lightbox has been around for a while and is well tested and proven.
я не получал ссылок, а зачел с гугла. связаться с редактором ресурса намного дольше, чем зарегиться на трэшмейл. мне нравится ваша идея, но нужно её додумывать и развивать
наверное этот http://vikjavev.no/highslide/
* The morphing effect that Lightview uses is a refreshing change (probably because I have seen the Lightbox effects too many times!).
* Lightview allows you to customise many of the visual aspects of the viewer programatically. For example, the background colour and corner radius.
* Lightview supports a customisable slideshow option which Lightbox lacks.
* Lightview uses the caption attribute of the tag to give images a caption. This attribute is not valid XHTML and thus its usage will produce invalid markup. I would suggest using a convention similar to that used by MooTools Tips: title="image title :: caption"
* Lightbox has been around for a while and is well tested and proven.
http://www.daniel-skinner.co.uk/tag/ligh…