Перегибать что? Я высказал своё мнение, на что имею полное право безо всяких условий в принципе, и ещё немного дополнительного морального права, потому что читаю хабр с самого основания. Мне такой контент, как эта статья, в RSS не нужен, если он нужен на Хабре ТМ, значит, надо завести отдельный фид с главной только с техническими статьями. Не вижу препятствий для реализации этого.
Это печально, в таком случае надо давать инструменты для настройки ленты, мне эта статья пришла в общем RSS, чего, на мой взгляд, быть не должно -- я хочу видеть там только материалы технического или научного в смысле science, а не humanities, характера. @Boomburum Как это можно сделать?
С такими допущениями исследование любого человеческого поведения можно протащить на хабр. О вкусах не спорят, но за себя я могу сказать, что не хочу видеть такие статьи в своей ленте. Другие люди пусть тоже выскажутся каждый за себя.
Chris's account matches my recollections in every respect and reminds me of some details I had forgotten. I fully endorse it.
I can add that it was indeed I who explicitly brought up terminology as an issue. I had a clearer initial sense than others there (though they did catch up with me later) that we were in effect planning a marketing and branding campaign. That sense was driving my thinking, and continued to do so for months afterwards. But it was something I didn't talk about much because I knew "marketing" was a bad word to these died-in-the-wool geeks, something they'd need to get used to thinking about gradually. I'd had to struggle with the concept myself before making peace with it.
The only other important thing this account leaves out is something Chris didn't know because she couldn't read my mind. The truth is that I spotted "open source" as the winner we were looking for almost immediately, the first or maybe second time it came up, well before I started advocating for it later in the discussion.
You see, I too was feeling like it was important not to step on the discussion, better to allow a consensus to develop without me forcing it. But I spotted the useful connection to "open source" as used in intelligence work immediately and was more excited than I let on. It seemed perfect for our propaganda needs - ideologically neutral, easily parsed, just enough connection to a respectable and established term of art. I was very impressed with Chris for inventing it.
I actually felt a considerable sense of relief when the other participants gravitated to the term. I would have fought for it over the alternatives on offer, but didn't have to. Bright crowd at that meeting; I was ahead of the curve only because I had put concentrated thought into the problems before I walked in. We all figured out what needed to be done, and we did it.
Ever since I was first reminded that "open source" was Chris's coinage I've been careful to credit it to her. She deserves her happy twinge. Maybe I would have come up with the same term or something as good myself, maybe not - it's good that we didn't have to roll those dice."
Я не подписан на эти хабы, это пришло из общей ленты.
Перегибать что? Я высказал своё мнение, на что имею полное право безо всяких условий в принципе, и ещё немного дополнительного морального права, потому что читаю хабр с самого основания. Мне такой контент, как эта статья, в RSS не нужен, если он нужен на Хабре ТМ, значит, надо завести отдельный фид с главной только с техническими статьями. Не вижу препятствий для реализации этого.
"Хабр не место для дискуссий"? Ну-ну.
Это печально, в таком случае надо давать инструменты для настройки ленты, мне эта статья пришла в общем RSS, чего, на мой взгляд, быть не должно -- я хочу видеть там только материалы технического или научного в смысле science, а не humanities, характера. @Boomburum Как это можно сделать?
С такими допущениями исследование любого человеческого поведения можно протащить на хабр. О вкусах не спорят, но за себя я могу сказать, что не хочу видеть такие статьи в своей ленте. Другие люди пусть тоже выскажутся каждый за себя.
Науке?
Почему это на Хабре?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diaspora_(social_network)
"Ушёл" в отношении Гвидо это громко сказано, он и сейчас работает над ускорением Питона в Майкрософт: https://www.softwareatscale.dev/p/software-at-scale-34-faster-python
Обещает, что 3.11 будет в два раза быстрее 3.10. Посмотрим.
https://speed.python.org
Sapper уже и не будет.
Рекомендую попробовать Antix.
Социальный экскеремент
Написали бы хоть, что это перевод, причём, довольно топорный: https://devblogs.microsoft.com/dotnet/happy-20th-anniversary-net/
Ну, формально SvelteKit ещё пока не релизнулся.
Пока непонятно, может быть, 5.26 будет, но как-то быстро получается. Нерационально саппортить два LTS-релиза с таким небольшим промежутком.
Последний LTS перед выходом шестой плазмы, по идее.
Хороший комментарий от Рэймонда под постом:
"Eric S. Raymond on 03 Feb 2018
Chris's account matches my recollections in every respect and reminds me of some details I had forgotten. I fully endorse it.
I can add that it was indeed I who explicitly brought up terminology as an issue. I had a clearer initial sense than others there (though they did catch up with me later) that we were in effect planning a marketing and branding campaign. That sense was driving my thinking, and continued to do so for months afterwards. But it was something I didn't talk about much because I knew "marketing" was a bad word to these died-in-the-wool geeks, something they'd need to get used to thinking about gradually. I'd had to struggle with the concept myself before making peace with it.
The only other important thing this account leaves out is something Chris didn't know because she couldn't read my mind. The truth is that I spotted "open source" as the winner we were looking for almost immediately, the first or maybe second time it came up, well before I started advocating for it later in the discussion.
You see, I too was feeling like it was important not to step on the discussion, better to allow a consensus to develop without me forcing it. But I spotted the useful connection to "open source" as used in intelligence work immediately and was more excited than I let on. It seemed perfect for our propaganda needs - ideologically neutral, easily parsed, just enough connection to a respectable and established term of art. I was very impressed with Chris for inventing it.
I actually felt a considerable sense of relief when the other participants gravitated to the term. I would have fought for it over the alternatives on offer, but didn't have to. Bright crowd at that meeting; I was ahead of the curve only because I had put concentrated thought into the problems before I walked in. We all figured out what needed to be done, and we did it.
Ever since I was first reminded that "open source" was Chris's coinage I've been careful to credit it to her. She deserves her happy twinge. Maybe I would have come up with the same term or something as good myself, maybe not - it's good that we didn't have to roll those dice."
Годы проходят, а комментарии под постами PVS-Studio не меняются :)
Рекомендую ещё посмотреть (стр. 34): https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:822493/FULLTEXT01.pdf
И это было семь лет назад.
То, что BTRFS стала дефолтной рутовой ФС в Федоре, говорит о то, что этому суждено измениться, а Оракл в своей системе, основанной на красношляпе и так рекомендует BTRFS: https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=Oracle-Btrfs-UEK6