Сей труд предназначен прежде всего для новичков в сетевом программИровании
Для чего конкретно он может понадобиться новичкам в сетевом программировании? Узнать устройство сетевого стека — windows internals + sir Andrew Tanenbaum. Узнать как написать «программу которая работает с berkeley-сокетами»? Вас самую малость опередили. Узнать как работают снифферы? Скачиваем wireshark source code и смотрим как на самом деле все происходит, в реальном мире. Я ничего не имею против содержания статьи, но её академичность и отдаленность от реальных задач ставит под вопрос вообще смысл её написания, т.к. эти вопросы в таком виде уже тысячи раз освещались.
Я могу уточнить это, но судя по очерку товарищ как минимум разбирается что антибиотики — это не простое лекарство, и что курс необходимо продолжать до полного выздоровления (что большинство людей не знает, а если и знают то не понимают почему), что дает мне надежду на то что он все-таки имеет «a biology background».
I have a biology background and the good news is that this amount of UV light is going to have the desired effect on the bacteria that live in your toothbrush head. It will induce many double strand breaks in the bacterial DNA, making it hard or impossible for them to grow. It will have no lasting harmful effects on the brush because no chemicals/toxins are used. My understanding is that there is a shut-off to prevent humans from being exposed to the UV light, which is a good thing as UV light will interfere with human DNA in the same way that it damages bacterial DNA. However, I would like to point out a few things:
1, The detergent in your toothpaste (variously called sodium lauryl sulfate, sodium laureth sulfate, ammonium lauryl sulfate, etc) will probably be effective enough at getting rid of bacteria — that's why we use it.
2, The bacteria are already in your mouth anyway! How do you think your toothbrush head is getting contaminated in the first place?
3, People have survived very happily without wasting money on idiotic gadgets like this.
4, The bacteria that are NOT killed by this treatment are more likely to be mutated. It's a biological fact that UV light increases the number of DNA mutations. While most bacteria will be killed, the 0.01% that survive are more likely to have suffered mutations. This is not true for cell-disruptive methods of destruction like bleach and detergent (including the detergent in your toothpaste).
To summarize, dentists use this sort of gizmo because they're putting the same tools into the mouths of many different people. They don't want to get sued, especially in light of reports suggesting that certain diseases may be passed through saliva. However, this gizmo is completely unnecessary if you do not share your brushheads with other people. In fact, it's not even necessary if you share your brushheads with people you wouldn't mind kissing…
Lastly, please bear in mind that not all bacteria are bad and that you actually need some to help you digest food properly. Also, good bacteria take up space and resources to keep bad bacteria from finding a niche. So, try NOT to use 'antibacterial' soap, do eat some live active yogurt after a course of antibiotics and always completely finish a course of antibiotics that you've been prescribed by a doctor.
1) Теория
2) Написание программульки, либо использование уже существующей
3) Windbg для полного понимания, что происходит «под капотом»
Чтение исходников,
особенное дилетантских,обычно ни к чему не приводит кроме как «о да, вот тут я вижу что эта функция вызывается».Для чего конкретно он может понадобиться новичкам в сетевом программировании? Узнать устройство сетевого стека — windows internals + sir Andrew Tanenbaum. Узнать как написать «программу которая работает с berkeley-сокетами»? Вас самую малость опередили. Узнать как работают снифферы? Скачиваем wireshark source code и смотрим как на самом деле все происходит, в реальном мире. Я ничего не имею против содержания статьи, но её академичность и отдаленность от реальных задач ставит под вопрос вообще смысл её написания, т.к. эти вопросы в таком виде уже тысячи раз освещались.
Все ИМХО.
P.S. ник у него — scientist :)
1, The detergent in your toothpaste (variously called sodium lauryl sulfate, sodium laureth sulfate, ammonium lauryl sulfate, etc) will probably be effective enough at getting rid of bacteria — that's why we use it.
2, The bacteria are already in your mouth anyway! How do you think your toothbrush head is getting contaminated in the first place?
3, People have survived very happily without wasting money on idiotic gadgets like this.
4, The bacteria that are NOT killed by this treatment are more likely to be mutated. It's a biological fact that UV light increases the number of DNA mutations. While most bacteria will be killed, the 0.01% that survive are more likely to have suffered mutations. This is not true for cell-disruptive methods of destruction like bleach and detergent (including the detergent in your toothpaste).
To summarize, dentists use this sort of gizmo because they're putting the same tools into the mouths of many different people. They don't want to get sued, especially in light of reports suggesting that certain diseases may be passed through saliva. However, this gizmo is completely unnecessary if you do not share your brushheads with other people. In fact, it's not even necessary if you share your brushheads with people you wouldn't mind kissing…
Lastly, please bear in mind that not all bacteria are bad and that you actually need some to help you digest food properly. Also, good bacteria take up space and resources to keep bad bacteria from finding a niche. So, try NOT to use 'antibacterial' soap, do eat some live active yogurt after a course of antibiotics and always completely finish a course of antibiotics that you've been prescribed by a doctor.