It all started as a joke by the office coffee machine. But, as with every decent joke, it suddenly sounded worth trying — and before we knew it, we were knee-deep in an experiment that turned out to be anything but trivial, complete with a whole minefield of gotchas.

It began simply: while everyone else was busy debating hardware tuning and squeezing out extra TPS from their systems, we thought — why not just shove a huge chunk of data into PostgreSQL and see how it holds up? Like, really huge. Say, a one-petabyte database. Let’s see how it survives that.

It was December 10, the boss wanted the report by January 20, and New Year was less than a month away. And that itch that all engineers know? It hit hard.

41 TB/day from Oracle to Postgres Pro without stopping the source system — not theory, but numbers from our latest tests. We broke the migration into three stages: fast initial load, CDC from redo logs, and validation, and wrapped them into ProGate. In this article, we’ll explain how the pipeline works, why we chose Go, and where the bottlenecks hide.

Declarative partitioning may sound complex, but in reality it’s just a way to tell your database how best to organize large tables — so it can optimize queries and make maintenance easier. Let’s walk through how it works and when declarative partitioning can save the day.

Now that pgpro-otel-collector has had its public release, I’m excited to start sharing more about the tool — and to kick things off, I’m launching a blog series focused entirely on the Collector.

The first post is an intro — a practical guide to installing, configuring, and launching the collector. We’ll also take our first look at what kind of data the collector exposes, starting with good old Postgres metrics.

Postgres Pro recently announced the release of Enterprise Manager 2, commonly known as PPEM.

In short, PPEM is an administration tool designed for managing and monitoring Postgres databases. Its primary goal is to assist DBAs in their daily tasks and automate routine operations. In this article, I'll take a closer look at what PPEM has to offer. My name is Alexey, and I'm part of the PPEM development team.

Why does even the most powerful LLM sometimes produce meaningless phrases and contradictions? It all comes down to the exponential growth of possibilities (N^M) and the free copying of human errors. Read the article to learn how we use formal grammars to turn chaotic generation into controlled synthesis, strengthening the role of semantics and enforcing structural rules.

Picture this: a mission-critical SQL query is crawling along. Not for an hour. Not for two. Fifteen hours. A full workday of the system slowly grinding through data while the business bleeds money and users teeter on the edge of a nervous breakdown. And then — cue the dramatic music — in walks the performance engineer.

After a few hours of intense analysis and a couple of pinpoint code tweaks, the same query that took 15 hours now completes in just… two minutes. Sounds like magic? Nope. This is the thrilling (and very real) world of performance engineering.

In this article, we’ll explore what vector search is, what problems it solves, and how the pgpro_vector extension for Postgres Pro brings powerful vector capabilities directly into a relational database — no need for separate specialized systems.

Today, I want to talk about one of those sneaky tricks that can help speed up query execution. Specifically, this is about reordering conditions in WHERE clauses, JOINs, HAVING clauses, and so on.

The idea is simple: if a condition in an AND chain turns out to be false, or if one in an OR chain turns out to be true, there's no need to evaluate the rest. That means saved CPU cycles — and sometimes, a lot of them. Let’s break this down.

Here I describe the results of developing a PostgreSQL extension I built just out of curiosity. Its purpose is to automatically manage extended column statistics. The idea came to me while finishing work on another "smart" query-driven product for improving PostgreSQL planning quality. I realized that the current architecture of PostgreSQL isn’t quite ready for fully autonomous operation — automatic detection of bad plans and adaptive optimizer tuning. So why not try the other way around and build an autonomous data-driven assistant?

How to compare the efficiency of SQL query plans? “Measure the execution time, of course!” — an experienced reader would say. And they would be absolutely right: from a practical perspective, the more efficient DBMS is the one that delivers higher TPS. However, sometimes we need to design a system that doesn't exist yet or predict behavior under loads that haven't occurred yet. In such cases, we need a characteristic that allows us to perform a qualitative analysis of a plan or compare two plans. This post is dedicated to one such characteristic — the number of data pages read.

For years, we’ve studied Oracle to make PostgreSQL a more migration-friendly option. We introduced tools similar to SQL profile and SQL plan baseline as AQO and sr_plan extensions. In some cases, PostgreSQL even outperforms Oracle, especially in automatic re-optimization.

Migrations from Oracle to PostgreSQL are usually smooth performance-wise, and we’ve even developed session variable extensions to make the transition easier. While many enterprise-only features exist, PostgreSQL often integrates popular solutions directly into the core.

Hi everyone, I’m Alexey. I’m a big fan of observability, and in this post, I want to share something I’ve been working on — the pgpro-otel-collector.

TL;DR: pgpro-otel-collector is an OpenTelemetry collector (aka monitoring agent) tailored for gathering Postgres metrics and logs — brought to you by PostgresPro.

If you've ever run multiple instances of PostgreSQL or other software on a single machine (whether virtual or physical), you've probably encountered the "noisy neighbor" effect — when instances disrupted each other. So, how do you make them get along? We’ve got the answer!

If you work with PostgreSQL, you've likely run into performance issues at some point — especially as your database grows. Things may have been running smoothly at first, but as your client database expanded, queries started slowing down. Sound familiar? Here's a guide to help you identify and fix problematic queries, so you can get your PostgreSQL database running at peak performance again.

Imagine a familiar situation: it’s Monday morning, tasks are piling up, and you need to quickly spin up a new service using Postgres Pro. Or maybe you’ve just upgraded your database server over the weekend — added more CPUs, more RAM.

Here’s how to get your database tuned and ready to make the most of the new hardware and workload, without wasting time.

DBAs often struggle to identify the most resource-hungry processes that degrade system performance. Back in 2017, DBA — and now Postgres Professional engineer — Andrey Zubkov faced the same challenge. This led him to develop pg_profile for PostgreSQL, which has since evolved into pgpro_pwr.

In this article, we’ll dive into strategic database monitoring and show you how to pinpoint bottlenecks in your databases using our tools.

We continue to follow the news about PostgreSQL 18. The January CommitFest brings in some notable improvements to monitoring, as well as other new features.

You can find previous reviews of PostgreSQL 18 CommitFests here: 2024-07, 2024-09, 2024-11.

According to Gartner, natural language queries will replace SQL as early as 2026. 

While Gartner's prediction may be optimistic, the shift toward natural language interfaces for databases is inevitable. The timeline may vary, but the transition itself is a certainty.

We continue the series of articles about new patches coming to PostgreSQL 18, this one covering the news of the November CommitFest.

If you missed the previous reviews, you can check them out here: 2024-07, 2024-09.