React Code Splitting in 2019

    It's 2019! Everybody thinks they know code splitting. So - let's double check!

    What does code splitting stand for?

    In short – code splitting is just about not loading a whole thing. Then you are reading this page you don't have to load a whole site. When you are selecting a single row from a database – you don't have to take all.
    Obvious? Code splitting is also quite obvious, just not about your data, but your code.

    Who(What?) is making code splitting?

    React.lazy? No – it only uses it. Code splitting is being done on a bundler level – webpack, parcel, or just your file system in case on "native" esm modules. Code splitting is just files, files you can load somewhere "later". So — to the questions "What is powering code splitting?" — the answer is — a "bundler".

    Who(What) is using code splitting?

    React.lazy is using. Just using code splitting of your bundler. Just calling import when got rendered. And that's all.

    What's about React-loadable?

    React.lazy superseded it. And provided more features, like Suspense to control loading state. So - use React.Lazy instead.

    Yep, that's all. Thank you for reading and have a nice day.

    Why article is not finished?

    Well. There are a few grey zones about React.lazy and code splitting I forgot to mention.

    Grey Zone 1 – testing

    It's not easy to test React.lazy due to its asynchroniosity. It would be just "empty", as long as it is not loaded yet(even if it is) – Promises and import returns, and lazy accepts, promises, which always got executed in the next tick.

    Proposed solution? You would not believe, but the proposed solution is to use synchronous thenablesSee pull request. So — lets make our imports SYNCHRONOUS!!! (to fix lazy issue for the tests, or any other server side case)

    const LazyText = lazy(() => ({
       then(cb) {   
          cb({default: Text});
          // this is "sync" thenable
    const root = ReactTestRenderer.create(
      <Suspense fallback={<Text text="Loading..." />}>          
         <LazyText text="Hi" /> // this lazy is not very lazy

    It's not hard to convert import function to a memoized synchronous thenable.

    const syncImport = (importFn) => {
       let preloaded = undefined;
       const promise = importFn().then(module => preloaded = module);
       // ^ "auto" import and "cache" promise   
       return () => preloaded ? { then: () => preloaded } : promise;
       // ^ return sync thenable then possible
    const lazyImport = isNode ? syncImport : a => a; 
    // ^ sync for node, async for browser
    const LazyComponent = React.lazy(lazyImport(() => import('./file'));

    Grey zone 2 – SSR

    If you DON'T need SSR – please continue reading the article!

    React.lazy is SSR friendly. But it requires Suspense to work, and Suspense is NOT server side friendly.

    There are 2 solutions:

    • Replace Suspense with Fragment, via mocking for example. Then, use the altered version of import with synchronous then to make lazy also behave synchronously.
      import React from 'react';
      const realLazy = React.lazy;
      React.lazy = importer => realLazy(syncImport(importer));
      React.Suspense = React.Fragment; // :P
      // ^ React SSR just got fixed :D

    This is a good option, but it would be not quite client side friendly. Why? Let's define the 2th possible solution:

    • Use a specialised library to track used scripts, chunks and styles, and load them on client side (especially styles!) before React hydration. Or else – you would render empty holes instead of your code splitted components. Yet again – you didn't load the code you just splitted, so you can't render anything you are going to.

    Behold code splitting libraries

    • Universal-component – the oldest, and still maintainable library. It "invented" code splitting in terms of – taught Webpack to code split.
    • React-loadable – very popular, but an unmaintained library. Made code spitting a popular thing. Issues are closed, so there is no community around.
    • Loadable-components – a feature complete library, it's a pleasure to use, with the most active community around.
    • Imported-component – a single library, not bound to Webpack, ie capable to handle parcel or esm.
    • React-async-component – already dead library(yet popular), which made a significant impact on everything around code splitting, custom React tree traversal and SSR.
    • Another library – there were many libraries, many of which did not survive Webpack evolution or React 16 – I haven't listed them here, but if you know a good candidate – just DM me.

    Which library to pick?

    It's easy – not react-loadable – it's heavy unmaintained and obsolete, even if it is still mega popular. (and thank you for popularizing code splitting, yet again)

    Loadable-components – might be a very good choice. It is very well written, actively maintained and support everything out of the box. Support "full dynamic imports", allowing you to import files depending on the props given, but thus untypable. Supports Suspense, so could replace React.lazy.

    Universal-component – actually "inventors" of full dynamic imports – they implemented it in Webpack. And many other things at low level – they did it. I would say – this library is a bit hardcore, and a bit less user friendly. Loadable-components documentation is unbeatable. It's worth if not to use this library, then read documentation - there are so many details you should know…

    React-imported-component – is a bit odd. It's bundler independent, so it would never break (there is nothing to break), would work with Webpack 5 and 55, but that comes with a cost. While previous libraries during SSR would add all the used scripts to the page body, and you will be able to load all the scripts in a parallel – imported don't know files names, and will call the original "imports"(that's why bundle independent) to load used chunks, but able to make call only from inside the main bundle – so all additional scripts would be loaded only after the main one got downloaded and executed. Does not support full dynamic imports, like React.lazy, and, as a result – typeable. Also supports Suspense. Uses synchronous thenables on SSR. It also has an absolutely different approach for CSS, and perfect stream rendering support.

    There is no difference in quality or popularity between listed libraries, and we are all good friends – so pick by your heart.

    Grey zone 3 – hybrid render

    SSR is a good thing, but, you know, hard. Small projects might want to have a SSR – there are a lot of reasons to have it – but they might not want to setup and maintain it.

    SSR could be really, REALLY hard. Try razzle or go with Next.js if you want a quick win.

    So the easiest my solution for SSR, especially for simple SPA would be prerendering. Like opening your SPA in a browser and hitting "Save" button. Like:

    • React-snap - uses puppeteer(aka headless Chrome) to render your page in a "browser" and saves a result as a static HTML page.
    • Rendertron - which does the same, but in a different (cloud) way.

    Prerendering is "SSR" without "Server". It's SSR using a Client. Magic! And working out of the box… … … but not for code spitting.
    So - you just rendered your page in a browser, saved HTML, and asked to load the same stuff. But Server Side Specific Code (to collect all used chunks) was not used, cos THERE IS NO SERVER!

    In the previous part, I've pointed to libraries which are bound to webpack in terms of collecting information about used chunks - they could not handle hybrid render at all.

    Loadable-components version 2(incompatible with current version 5), was partially supported by react-snap. Support has gone.

    React-imported-component could handle this case, as long as it is not bound to the bundler/side, so there is no difference for SSR or Hybrid, but only for react-snap, as long as it support "state hydration", while rendertron does not.

    This ability of react-imported-component was found during writing this article, it was not known before - see example. It's quite easy.

    And here you have to use another solution, which is just perpendicular to all other libraries.


    This library was created for partial hydration, and could partially rehydrate your app, keeping the rest still de-hydrated. And it works for SSR and Hybrid renderers without any difference.
    The idea is simple:

    • during SSR - render the component ,wrapped with a <div/>
    • on the client - find that div, and use innerHTML until Component is ready to replace dead HTML.
    • you don't have to load, and wait for a chunk with splitted component before hydrate to NOT render a white hole instead of it - just use pre-rendered HTML, which is absolutely equal to the one a real component would render, and which already exists — it comes with a server(or hydrid) response.

    That's why we have to wait for all the chunks to load before hydrate - to match server-rendered HTML. That's why we could use pieces of server-rendered HTML until client is not ready — it is equal to the one we are only going to produce.

    import {PrerenderedComponent} from 'react-prerendered-component';
    const importer = memoizeOne(() => import('./Component'));
    // ^ it's very important to keep the "one" promise
    const Component = React.lazy(importer); 
    // or use any other library with ".prefetch" support
    // all libraries has it (more or less)
    const App = () => (
      <PrerenderedComponent live={importer()}> 
         {/* ^ shall return the same promise */ }
            <Component /> 
         {/* ^ would be rendered when a component goes "live" */ }

    There is another article about this technology, you might read. But main here — it solves "Flash Of Unloaded Content" in another, not a common for code splitting libraries way. Be open for a new solutions.


    • don't use react-loadable, it would not add any valuable value
    • React.lazy is good, but too simple, yet.
    • SSR is a hard thing, and you should know it
    • Hybrid puppeteer-driven rendering is a thing. Sometimes even harder thing.

    Similar posts

    AdBlock has stolen the banner, but banners are not teeth — they will be back


    Comments 6

      Who is making code splitting?
      Who is using code splitting?

      Вы делаете мне стыдно. Как уж это… а, myötähäpeä!

      Не надо так лецмиспикать форм йор хеарт...

        Sorry. But you could be a bit more concrete? У меня и русский то фантастический, без посторонней помощи мне проблему не то что не решить — не увидеть.
          «Ни слова больше!!1» (с) :-D

          > But you could be a bit more concrete?

          Вопросительное предложение «нормального человека» (в противопоставление вопросительному предложению курильщика) порядок слов обратный имеет.

          Про who. Сравни:
          Who let the dogs out? (Bob did)
          What makes the Sun shine? (Nuclear reaction)

          А теперь вперед, мгимо финишать!, «не опускай лапки» (тм) возьми какой-нибудь лонгман инглиш грамар ин юз и заштудируй его раз двадцать :)

          статью я, естественно, не дочитал. там таких казусов может быть поболе.

          P.S.: почему не в личку? потому что каждая вторая статья для «английского хабра» — такая. с этим надо что-то делать…

          анекдот не в тему:
          — Hey, tutor, can I smoke in the classroom?
          — Yes, you can, but you may not!

          у меня всё :) (уходит, напевая)
          взял наливки из черешен, взял пельмешков, сел за стол
          we don't need no education, we don't need no mind control
          ол ин ол иц джаст эназа брик ин зэ вол.

            Минус за

            статью я, естественно, не дочитал

            Был бы второй — поставил бы еще за

            P.S.: почему не в личку? потому что каждая вторая статья для «английского хабра» — такая

            Публичной поркой вы только отбиваете желание писать статьи на английском, и это совершенно бессмысленно.

            Ну и

            с этим надо что-то делать…

            Так обогатите сообщество хоть одной своей интересной статьей на любом языке

              Любой автор до выпуска публикации должен обладать некоторой долей самокритики к своему творчеству, выполнить вычитку, а если на иностранном, то отдать знающим людям или нативу. здесь этого нет.

              лецмиспик фром мы хеарт — это не то, что стоит показывать, даже, будь там твет на главный вопрос жизни, вселенной и всего такого.

              Надеюсь, вы, halfcupgreentea, испытали невиданный экстаз, откопав статью трехмесячной давности, чтобы зайти в мой профиль и нажать на минус. Подкопите и приходите завтра. Мне не жалко!

              P.S.: да, фаллометрией по поводу выпущенных мною статей, их количеством и языком оригинала я с вами заниматься не буду, уж извините.

                Уже более трех лет проживаю в Австралии и местные "нативы" с тобой не согласятся:

                • о том что кто-то кому-то должен в одностороннем порядке
                • лецмиспик фром мы хеарт(некоторые районы вообще по английски не бубу)
                • их способности к вычитке

                Прости незнакомец, но писать такие вот статейки для меня самый лучший способ писать их лучше.

      Only users with full accounts can post comments. Log in, please.