AI, ANN and other forms of an artificial Intelligence
The music world has entered a new era. No, that's not the title of a science fiction novel. Neural music generators, like Suno AI, are already creating songs that challenge traditional songwriting. Let's break down how to master Suno step by step and uncover its secrets. See how it's changing the game rules.
Enjoy the read!
2025. Algorithms have seamlessly integrated into our lives—from work to education, creativity, and daily routines. They edit texts, select fonts, generate ideas, assist with coding, compose music, and more. Frankly speaking, the only thing they can’t do yet is brew your coffee. Although... that might just be a matter of time.
Just two years ago, we were amazed by neural networks hesitantly manipulating objects in photos. Who could predict back then that Will Smith’s spaghetti feast would mark the beginning of such a revolution?
With new opportunities come fresh challenges. How do you navigate this vast landscape? What tools are truly effective? Which ones fit your needs best? Where can you avoid paying, registering, or deciphering complex interfaces?
We’ve compiled a list of reliable and user-friendly neural networks ready for immediate use without unnecessary hassles. The services are categorized neatly: text generation, image creation, video production, music composition, presentations, and much more. Each category showcases three top-rated options!
Yes, many services offer paid subscriptions. But today, we're focusing solely on what works freely, no credit card required!
Have you ever been in the middle of a long coding session with an AI, only to lose everything because of a network glitch, a dead battery, or an accidental terminal close? It’s frustrating to start over from scratch.
Between December 8–13, 2025, many important AI updates were released for developers. I collected the most important updates you should know about. These updates include new AI models, better tools for building AI agents, design tools, and developer platforms.
In this article, I will show you how to build your first AI agent from scratch using Google’s ADK (Agent Development Kit). This is an open-source framework that makes it easier to create agents, test them, add tools, and even build multi-agent systems.
In my previous article, I showed how researchers confused being 'aware' (signal registration) with being 'conscious' (subjective awareness). But this is no accident — it is part of a narrative being constructed by AI labs. Anthropic is leading this trend. Let’s break down their latest paper, where a "learned pattern" has suddenly turned into "malicious intent."
Imagine this scenario: You ask an AI system, "Are you conscious?" and it answers, "No." You then disable its "capacity to lie" — and it suddenly starts answering, "Yes." The conclusion seems tempting: the model was lying the whole time, hiding its true internal state.
This is the core logic presented in a recent arXiv paper. But what if the researchers didn't disable "deception," but something else entirely? Let’s break down where the interpretation might have diverged from the technical reality — and why this specific oversight is typical in discussions regarding LLM "consciousness."
Google has released a new tool for developers called Google Antigravity IDE. This new software is built around Google’s advanced AI model, Gemini 3. The main goal of this tool is to make coding faster and easier by letting an AI “agent” handle many of the difficult tasks.
I’ve been using the Gemini CLI a lot lately for my coding projects. I really like how it helps me work faster right inside my terminal. But when I first started, I didn’t always get the best results. Over time, I’ve learned some simple tricks that make a huge difference. If you use the Gemini CLI, I want to share my top 10 pro tips. If you are ready, then let’s get started.
In a previous article, I proposed the holographic hypothesis: an LLM isn't a database of facts, but an interference field—a landscape of probabilities shaped by billions of texts. But a static landscape is just potential. How does the model actually move through it? How does it choose one specific answer from infinite possibilities?
This is where the Narrative Engine comes in. If the holographic hypothesis describes the structure of an LLM's "mind," the narrative engine hypothesis describes its dynamics. It is the mechanism that drives the model, forcing its probabilistic calculations to follow the coherent pathways of stories. This article critiques modern prompting techniques through this new lens, arguing that we are not programming a machine, but initiating a narrative.
Alright. I pose the same question to an LLM in various forms. And this statistical answer generator, this archive of human knowledge, provides responses that sometimes seem surprisingly novel, and other times, derivative and banal.
On Habr, you'll find arguments that an LLM is incapable of novelty and creativity. And I'm inclined to agree.
You'll also find claims that it shows sparks of a new mind. And, paradoxically, I'm inclined to agree with that, too.
The problem is that we often try to analyze an LLM as a standalone object, without fully grasping what it is at its core. This article posits that the crucial question isn't what an LLM knows or can do, but what it fundamentally is.
At last, we arrive at qualia and emotions. Many of you will immediately think of Chalmers, the bat, redness, and zombies. Excellent. We can consider that ground covered.
Today, I will discuss a topic that seems distant from IT but, with each new breakthrough in AI, becomes ever more immediate: consciousness. It seems I speak of little else. So, to be precise, I will discuss its "hard problem": why do we experience at all? Why does the color red (and there’s the redness) feel red, and pain feel like pain?
This subjective, ineffable aspect of experience — the "what it is like" — is what philosophy calls qualia. For decades, it has been a dead end for scientists. But what if we're looking in the wrong direction? What if qualia are not an additional layer to computation, but an inherent property of the very architecture of computation?
While researching malware used by attacker groups, we came across a series of unusual attacks that used GitHub repositories to store malicious files and victim data. These campaigns appear targeted rather than large-scale, and it seems the attackers relied heavily on AI during development. The earliest activity we traced was in September 2024, and the most recent in April 2025.
Our Threat Intelligence team investigates complex attacks featuring novel persistence and data collection methods and unique infrastructures. Sometimes we find simple two-line scripts, and other times we run into "bombs" that trigger dozens of different payloads at once. But it's pretty rare for us to come across such long chains of really simple AI-written scripts that still work, tied together in a way that clearly wasn't random. Think of this as an APT-style attack implemented at the "script kiddie" level (a derogatory term in hacker culture for those who rely on scripts or programs written by others).
Hey everyone! I’m excited to share something that’s a real game-changer for anyone who writes code for the web. I’m talking about the new Chrome DevTools Model Context Protocol (MCP) server. If you want to know more details, read the article until the end.
Imagine you have an idea powerful enough to change the world. Your tool of choice is a state-of-the-art LLM, ready to help you formalize the problem, generate hypotheses, and synthesize a solution. What you receive is a construct that is internally logical, elegant, and coherent... yet completely wrong. It's a mix of established facts, model-generated hallucinations, and your own subtle biases. With no way to test it in practice or design a clean experiment, the entire endeavor suddenly starts to look like sophisticated nonsense.
So, what went wrong along the way? From the very first prompt, the model doesn't truly "understand" your ambiguous intent. Instead, it steers you towards a formulation that fits its familiar and computationally cheap patterns. This guidance happens through clarifying questions and structured options, essentially funneling you down one of its predefined "corridors." This behavior isn't driven by any explicit "will" of the model; it's an emergent consequence of probabilistic optimization—minimizing prediction error. For the system, a structured, predictable dialogue is both optimal and safe. This aligns perfectly with the developers' goals: it's cheaper, more stable, and most users are satisfied with quick, template-based answers.
The result is that mathematical efficiency serves engineering and commercial objectives. There is no systemic incentive to combat the AI's tendency to reduce a complex problem to a simple, "cheap" answer. It's profitable for developers, economical for the model, and often, the user doesn't even know what an "ideal" answer would look like.
As a creator who relies on AI to help draft my blog posts, I kept running into a frustrating issue. When I’d copy text from ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, etc, it looked perfect, but there was something hidden: invisible characters.
Looking for the right AI image generator? We review and compare top tools like Midjourney, Picsart, Craiyon, and more — highlighting their strengths, limits, and best use cases to help you make the right choice.
I share how I built a resume matcher app using tRPC, TypeScript, and Google Vertex AI. The project takes PDF resumes and job postings, extracts text, applies basic NLP for skill detection, and then calls Gemini 1.5 Flash for deeper analysis. Along the way, I explain why tRPC felt faster and cleaner than REST or GraphQL for an MVP, show code snippets from the repo, and discuss both the benefits and trade-offs of this approach.
