Исаия Num

Есть исследования, которые проводились в разных странах мира, в т. ч. у нас в институте биофизики.

При выполнении более сложных задач, потребление повышается. В частности я говорю про сложную работу с PDF, которую Kindle выполнять не может, но и не только про неё.

Например, некоторым нужно работать с xls, или ppt; кто-то любит Cool reader; некоторым нужны игры и т. д.

Площадь экрана больше на 68%.

Согласно опубликованному скриншоту, злоумышленники верно ввели код из SMS, а вот узнать пароль для двухфакторной авторизации не смогли.

At the end of February, a team of computer scientists at Aarhus University posted a paper arguing that if another unproven conjecture is also true, this is indeed the fastest way multiplication can be done.

Сернил очень быстро вызывает зависимость, кроме того этот товарищ крайне ревнив к другим источникам мирских удовольствий: в сочетании с иными веществами — например с алкоголем, марихуаной или бензодиазепинами — может приводить к коме.

Потом начинаются психические расстройства, причём разные в зависимости от психического склада людей (примерно как во время пьянки на корпоративе): у кого-то начинается депрессия, у кого-то — эйфория, как повезёт. Кто-то активно скачет и ржёт, а кто-то сидит и плачет. Начинается иллюзорное восприятие мира: пятна и трещины на стенах воспринимаются как предметы, люди воспринимаются искажёнными, вокруг всё окрашено в неестественные цвета.

А что насчёт кардиналов, не совместимых с аксиомой выбора?

Вторая проблема Гильберта улыбается, глядя на ваш пост.

В принципе, представление о том, что реальность ничто иное как иллюзия, существует давно. Об этом задумывались еще древние греки, включая Пифагора и Платона.

При посадке в поезд пассажир обязан предъявить оригинал документа, который указан в билете.

Посадка в поезд осуществляется только при наличии подлинного документа, удостоверяющего личность пассажира, на основании которого приобретён проездной документ.

Завязка:
Эппл запрещает всем делать «нормальные разъёмы», ибо ИНТЕЛЛЕКТУАЛЬНАЯ СОБСТВЕННОСТЬ. Из-за этого Type-C проектируют с «язычком» и, по сути, не кабель вставляется в телефон, а телефон вставляется в кабель.

Кульминация:
Внезапно Эппл осознаёт, что от идеи с уникальным кабелем больше вреда, чем пользы, и теперь тоже переходит на разъём, искалеченный ранее их же патентом.

Развязка:
Все, включая Эппл, пользуются «вывернутыми наизнанку» разъёмами, нормальные разъёмы делать запрещено из-за патента Эппл.

There is a 2-digit number of pundits in IUT in 2018, from 6 countries.

No French, British, Russian, Chinese or Japanese mathematicians are known to have ever publicly said or written anything negative about IUT.

Since 2014 or even earlier Scholze started to tell publicly at various workshops about ’faults’ in IUT. I wrote to him a couple of times asking to do things properly: tell precisely what were the ’faults’ with IUT he knew and to communicate with the author of IUT instead of publicly telling negative things about IUT. He declined to participate in our 2015 Oxford IUT workshop where one could learn many relevant things. Eventually, Scholze sent only one very vaguely and broadly stated question to Mochizuki in May 2015. The author of IUT responded to him with a long email, also kindly offering to conduct discussions via email to address any questions. Scholze responded he was too busy and stopped the email correspondence at that time. Part of this is stated on p.3 of the main Mochizuki’s report9 at his new page10 where all files deserve attention.
Scholze continued to publicly talk that something was wrong with IUT. I invited him to visit and discuss, but to no avail. After a long time, he came with Stix to Kyoto in March 2018 just for 5 days. Apparently without any ready ’faults’ to indicate and searching for some other ’errors’ in IUT. Mochizuki writes about this further on the same p.3, ’On the other hand, the March 2018 discussions centered around quite different issues, such as (Ind1,2)’. Ind1,2,3 are three fundamental indeterminacies one needs to allow in order to have certain functoriality/multiradiality in IUT. By the end of their short visit Scholze–Stix came with their own strange version of IUT based on their fundamentaly incorrect oversimplification of IUT by identifying all isomorphic rings with one another. This oversimplification is entirely inappropriate for anabelian geometry and IUT, and the reaction of experts to this oversimplification can be read in sect.18 of the report11. This oversimplification strikes as incorrect even people far from number theory, e.g. math physicists and categorists. In particular, the position of Scholze–Stix weirdly denies the use of anabelian geometry in IUT. No other learner of IUT has ever had any problems with (Ind1,2).

Almost all negative sentiments about IUT on the internet originate from USA, the country where there are currently no active experts with (peer reviewed) research track record even in anabelian geometry. No French, British, Russian, Chinese or Japanese mathematicians are known to have ever publicly said or written anything negative about IUT.

An example of organised disinformation is a recent article in a journal called quanta. That article consists almost entirely of opinions of non-specialists. Its author (not a professional mathematician) declined suggestions to make the article accurate and much less biased by increasing the ratio of experts opinions from current almost zero, by correcting numerous incorrect statements, and by including information about the level of expertise in
the subject area of each cited mathematician.

Fact 1. No valid concrete math evidence of any serious fault in IUT has been given so far by anyone. Moreover, IUT is so robust that it allows various further stronger extensions.

Fact 2. To become in expert in IUT, one has to invest something like 2 years of continuous work. There is a 2-digit number of pundits in IUT in 2018, from 6 countries. Time dedicated to the work leading to IUT and to its study by others exceeds 50 years. Hundreds of questions about IUT have been answered, they included very interesting comments and remarks. In terms of its mathematical value and invested effort this stands in contrast with the study of IUT by Scholze and Stix whose attempt to find a possible ’fault’ in IUT was unsuccessful.

Fact 3. The main compulsory prerequisite for IUT is arithmetic anabelian geometry developed in 1990–2014 in Japan. There were/are no active experts in arithmetic anabelian geometry or IUT in 2012/2018 in several mathematically prominent countries including USA. Experts in IUT have not made public negative remarks about it. They do not participate in internet discussions on IUT and almost none among them gives interviews.

Fact 4. Almost all negative remarks about IUT come from a very small group of people working in areas far from anabelian geometry, their associates, or even from people with no arithmetic geometry track record. The authors of those opinions often behave irresponsibly by talking about mathematics they do not know and by misleading other people who cannot distinguish an expert from a non-specialist. Some internet texts about IUT are so incorrect that they can induce opinions which are antipode to the truth. Mass media articles about IUT typically mix pundit opinions with that of people who have empty research track record in the subject area, and these articles do not inform about the expertise of people they quote, thus misinforming their readers

Since 2014 or even earlier Scholze started to tell publicly at various workshops about ’faults’ in IUT. I wrote to him a couple of times asking to do things properly: tell precisely what were the ’faults’ with IUT he knew and to communicate with the author of IUT instead of publicly telling negative things about IUT. He declined to participate in our 2015 Oxford IUT workshop where one could learn many relevant things. Eventually, Scholze sent only one very vaguely and broadly stated question to Mochizuki in May 2015. The author of IUT responded to him with a long email, also kindly offering to conduct discussions via email to
address any questions. Scholze responded he was too busy and stopped the email correspondence at that time. Part of this is stated on p.3 of the main Mochizuki’s report9 at his new page10 where all files deserve attention.
Scholze continued to publicly talk that something was wrong with IUT. I invited him to visit and discuss, but to no avail. After a long time, he came with Stix to Kyoto in March 2018 just for 5 days. Apparently without any ready ’faults’ to indicate and searching for some other ’errors’ in IUT. Mochizuki writes about this further on the same p.3, ’On the other hand, the March 2018 discussions centered around quite different issues, such as (Ind1,2)’. Ind1,2,3 are three fundamental indeterminacies one needs to allow in order to have certain functoriality/multiradiality in IUT. By the end of their short visit Scholze–Stix came with their own strange version of IUT based on their fundamentaly incorrect oversimplification of IUT by identifying all isomorphic rings with one another. This oversimplification is entirely inappropriate for anabelian geometry and IUT, and the reaction of experts to this oversimplification can be read in sect.18 of the report11. This oversimplification strikes as incorrect even people far from number theory, e.g. math physicists and categorists. In particular, the position of Scholze–Stix weirdly denies the use of anabelian geometry in IUT. No other learner of IUT has ever had any problems with (Ind1,2).

Как бы там ни было, прощание с аудиовыходом на «Макбуке» кажется мне безальтернативным (хотя, опять же, никем не обещанным) решением.

Предположим, фотон входит в интерферометр, когда там нет второго светоделителя. Он должен вести себя как частица.